• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Covid Vaccines Increase Risk of Severe Heart Inflammation Up to 120-Fold, Major Study Finds

by Will Jones
24 April 2022 7:00 AM

Covid vaccination increases the risk of severe heart inflammation up to 120-fold, a major study from Scandinavia published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) has found.

The study looked at over 23 million patient records covering the over-12s populations of Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden from the start of the vaccine rollout in December 2020 to October 5th 2021.

For young males aged 16-24 years within 28 days of a second dose the study found severe myocarditis (requiring inpatient hospital admission) around five times more common after Pfizer and 14 times more common after Moderna. This corresponded to six events per 100,000 people after Pfizer and 18 events per 100,000 after Moderna. A second dose of Moderna given after a first dose of Pfizer came with even higher risk: a 36-fold increased risk, corresponding to 27 events per 100,000 people. The Moderna vaccine has three times the dose of mRNA of the Pfizer vaccine, which the authors suggest lies behind the increased risk.

The authors observe that of the 213 severe myocarditis cases in the 28-day risk window after a second dose of mRNA vaccine, 135 occurred within the first week. This is more than half, meaning the risk in that week is greatly elevated. Among males aged 16 to 24 years, the risk was around 13-fold greater during the week after a second dose of Pfizer and 38-fold greater after a second dose of Moderna. For a second dose of Moderna where the first dose was Pfizer the risk was 120-fold greater.

It’s worth noting that the bar for myocarditis here is very high, excluding even those who receive medical attention as a hospital outpatient, let alone anything milder; even the milder cases, however, may cause long-term damage.

The study found that the severe myocarditis risk following Covid infection was negligible, with only around one excess event per 100,000 within 28 days of infection and a confidence interval that included zero.

For some reason the study did not look at the risk outside the 28-day post-vaccination window, so we don’t know whether the elevated risk continues past that period.

It’s worth bearing in mind that the risk estimates are adjusted estimates based on modelling that takes into account potential confounding factors: sex, age group, health care worker status, nursing home resident and certain listed comorbidities. The unadjusted risk estimates are not stated, and we do not know how sound the adjustments are. It’s not clear why it was necessary to use modelling to adjust for these factors rather than, say, simply providing results stratified by sex and age and with health care workers, nursing home residents and people with comorbidities excluded, at least from some of the results. Modelled adjustments are often opaque, especially when unadjusted estimates aren’t provided, whereas stratified findings are usually clear.

The results were summarised as follows:

Among 23,122,522 Nordic residents (81% vaccinated by study end; 50.2% female), 1,077 incident myocarditis events and 1,149 incident pericarditis events were identified. Within the 28-day period, for males and females 12 years or older combined who received a homologous schedule [two vaccine doses of the same type], the second dose was associated with higher risk of myocarditis, with adjusted IRRs [incidence rate ratios] of 1.75 (95% CI [confidence interval], 1.43-2.14) for BNT162b2 [Pfizer] and 6.57 (95% CI, 4.64-9.28) for mRNA-1273 [Moderna]. Among males 16 to 24 years of age, adjusted IRRs were 5.31 (95% CI, 3.68-7.68) for a second dose of BNT162b2 and 13.83 (95% CI, 8.08-23.68) for a second dose of mRNA-1273, and numbers of excess events were 5.55 (95% CI, 3.70-7.39) events per 100,000 vaccinees after the second dose of BNT162b2 and 18.39 (9.05-27.72) events per 100,000 vaccinees after the second dose of mRNA-1273. Estimates for pericarditis were similar.

Here’s the complete table of results for severe myocarditis in the 28-day window. Note that the risk is considerably elevated for many subgroups, particularly for males under 40 (not just aged 16-24) following a second Moderna dose, but also in other cases too. However, the wide confidence intervals make the findings uncertain in many subgroups outside males under 40.

The authors conclude the risks “should be balanced against the benefits of protecting against severe COVID-19 disease”. However, given the extremely low risk of Covid to healthy young males and the considerably elevated risk of severe myocarditis following vaccination – plus the risks associated with other adverse effects, short and long term – it’s hard to see how it could be worth it, or why these vaccines have not already been withdrawn for younger age groups.

This post has been updated. An earlier version incorrectly suggested there was inconsistency in the number of severe myocarditis events reported in the study.

Tags: Adverse eventsDenmarkFinlandHeart inflammationMyocarditisNorwaySafetySwedenVaccines

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

News Round-Up

Next Post

Douglas Murray: “I Love the Western World. Is that Such a Crime?”

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

130 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago

Surely sceptics can now state with a degree of confidence that the vaccination campaign here in the UK was really a test of compliance.

The compliant were therefore subjected to two experiments; one to guage their level of compliance to authority; the second to test the efficacy of experimental drugs.

A scandal, but one I suspect most will be keen to overlook.

244
-3
Fortyman
Fortyman
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

And maybe that is why there is no incandescent outrage at what has been done to them/us.. I find it hard to understand why I seem to be the only person I actually know, who feels like this.

122
-2
stewart
stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  Fortyman

I think it is becoming increasingly clear that the freedom and liberalism of the last 50 or so years has been an exceptional blip in the otherwise long arc of history of humans being trampled by power and authority and quietly putting up with it.

132
-1
Jo
Jo
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Exactly so. I listened to an Israeli journalist talking about this very thing back in 2020, and my heart sank, with the realisation that it was true.

Last edited 3 years ago by Jo
48
-1
Rowan
Rowan
3 years ago
Reply to  Fortyman

Yes, we are a rare breed, but I do know a few people who didn’t roll over, despite the blatantly unscientific nonsense being spouted by government and media 24/7. That being said, all of my elderly long time and so called clever friends couldn’t bare their arms fast enough for their dose of poison. Stupid is as stupid does.

Last edited 3 years ago by Rowan
73
-2
NickR
NickR
3 years ago
Reply to  Fortyman

I’ve shown Government data to vaxxed friends that clearly shows that the vaxxed are:

  1. More likely to contract covid
  2. No more/less likely to die of it (deaths are proportionate to the vaxxed/unvaxxed)
  3. Over the past 3 months the likelihood of contracting, being hospitalised, or dying of covid has reduced faster (by 5-24x) for the unvaxxed than the vaxxed

Not one has ever shown the vaguest interest.

54
-1
morganlefey
morganlefey
3 years ago
Reply to  NickR

We have a legal and moral responsibility to devastatingly, and According To Law with correct judicial process, annihilate the perpetrators and principal collaborators of the covid policy assault against humanity, if they are found guilty of Crimes Against Humanity.

8
0
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

This is also what I’ve believed for a long time – that it was a test of compliance and of more broader social behaviour e.g. how easily subgroups can be stigmatised and to what extremes the ‘in-group’ would go in their discrimination. The findings were terrifying.

83
-1
ThomasTurk
ThomasTurk
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

No.. it’s simply depopulation, having scared the public with the non virus.. I explain. .

There’s NO virus.. just a lab made spike protein.

The Identity of the Virus: Health/ Science Institutions Worldwide “Have No Record” of SARS-COV-2 Isolation/Purification. Dr. Christine Massey, Dec. 2021.

US lawyer Dr Francis Boyle, who has drafted Bio-Warfare Regs. has evidence that Harvard U Chem. Dept. Dr. Charles Lieber & Oz. Health Dept aided Wuhan Labs in the project to create the bio-weapon spike protein, in which, cancer, hap. and HIV codes are embedded.

A fake test was used to create a Scare-scam-demic.

Dr. Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test stated that his test only idents strands of DNA from Hep. and various Flus, and that the test was NEVER intended to be used as a diagnostic tool.

US Dr. Elisabeth Eads studies noted that the PCR test gives 97% false positives. The quick antigen test gives a 40% false negative! (Danish Manufacturer). 3 rapid test kits have Sodium azide, a chemical is found in herbicides and, pest control agents,

NOTE!! The WHO on Jan. 20, 2021 in their Directive #202005 stated that the PCR test is of NO VALUE.. this superseding their Jan.20.2020 advice to do PCR test.

3
0
Arum
Arum
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

I’m not sure I believe there are 2 experiments going on. For it to be a test of the efficacy of experimental drugs, someone would need to be gathering data rather than simply injecting everyone. It doesn’t seem that the necessary data are being collected, at least in this country. I think it’s more likely that the organisations behind the injection campaign really don’t care about the efficacy of their jabs. Or, perhaps, they have decided that the jabs work, and nothing’s going to change their minds.

25
-2
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago
Reply to  Arum

They only care about how much money they get: the Covid vaccines were the single most profitable drug launch in the history of medicine. It is obscene how much Pfizer and Moderna made. I truly hope they are both bankrupted and have their licenses to sell pharmaceutical products revoked forever.

9
0
ThomasTurk
ThomasTurk
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

Efficacy.. HOW would an in..ction laced with graphene, AIDS, hep, cancer, parasites and nanobots have ANY efficacy.. when some DIE from massive clots ON INJECTION?

1
0
Dodgy Geezer
Dodgy Geezer
3 years ago

I assume that the establishment response will be that this study does not confirm to establishment findings, so it is therefore suspect.

Followed by its swift withdrawal on the grounds of unspecified grammatical errors….

Last edited 3 years ago by Dodgy Geezer
68
-2
Fortyman
Fortyman
3 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

Last week they were promoting the vaccination bus visiting schools for twelves and over. How can that, in all conscience and given the known data, be considered ethical and moral!

92
-1
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Fortyman

I thought they weren’t visiting Schools, just parents given the location of their local vaccination centre. It seems I was wrong. That is, unfortunately, a way to get the numbers up.

5
-1
JXB
JXB
3 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

The Establishment only accepts ‘truth’ – which they supply – not independent fact aka mis/disinformation.

25
-1
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  JXB

And when Mark Steyn uses the governments own stats to show how useless the ‘vaccines’ are, they’re taken off youtube. I looked at his whole show that is around one hour, that segment is missing.

Last edited 3 years ago by Ron Smith
19
-1
bucksfizz
bucksfizz
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Smith

It’s still there (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8kdH2Xgf-k from 9:45), as I sent it to a triple vaccinated friend. Needless to say, I received no reply – his head is still firmly buried in the sand.

19
0
jingleballix
jingleballix
3 years ago

This, and more, was predicted from the outset i.e. late-2020, when the jabs became reality.

So for 18 months now, the authorities have been pushing multiple shots of drugs that they knew were, at best totally experimental, and at worst downright harmful – and of course, sold to us on the utterly false twin-premise……

……..’take this/these and you won’t die, and you can’t pass it on, oh, and by the way anyone who doesn’t is to be made a pariah’.

I have watched on, defiantly unjabbed, and wondered whether or not I was being subjected to some kind of intelligence test.

155
-1
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  jingleballix

Gullability test is probably more accurate.

And they are still pushing them. Still the same wording used universally; vaccines are still the best way to protect you and your family.

89
-1
mishmash
mishmash
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

Gullible is believing influenza completely disappeared in 2020, or that a novel virus was responsible for existing illnesses and the side effects of a new gene therapy intended to protect from the alleged virus.

32
-1
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

At least in Poland they’re seeing sense I hear, because they had rejected further shots from the EU.

29
-2
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

‘Trust me’, said Himmler. ‘I’m just a nice guy who just wants what’s best for the German people’.

5
0
JXB
JXB
3 years ago
Reply to  jingleballix

Not an intelligence test, a stupid test.

Intelligence is no immunity to stupid.

I am beginning to think there is an inverse relationship; higher the IQ the more stupid.

27
-1
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago
Reply to  JXB

IQ only tests spatial awareness on paper and a bit of verbal reasoning and logic. It’s an entirely useless test of intelligence in general life.

6
0
paulnb
paulnb
3 years ago

Still amazing how so many people have blithely allowed this mRNA stuff into their bodies without even thinking. And for what? Originally it was ‘safe and effective’ and would stop covid in its tracks. Then the goalposts were moved when it became evident that it didn’t. Then the mantra became ‘prevents hospitalisation and death’ – as if this could ever be proved one way or another.
Now it is quite clear that the ‘vaccine’ is pretty useless and potentially dangerous and we still really have no long term study of the after effects.
But there are plenty of jurisdictions still pretending that vaxxing makes a difference when all recent evidence is to the contrary. For ultimate looniness look at West Australia and the bars who insist on stamping your wrist with ‘vaxxed’ on entry, or the Toronto Zoo injecting some animals with some sort of covid preventative. I never knew there were so many fools in this world

138
-1
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  paulnb

That’s the real worry, the lack of thought. I expect politicians and corporations to be sinister, to erode our freedoms. But I was astonished at the total lack of thought in ordinary people.

When they began rolling out the injections for people in their 30s and 40s I watched as every single workmate just accepted it. Their only comments were related to booking appointments and feeling rough. Zero analysis on what was being injected. Many had no idea which concoction they had received, Pfizer or AstraZeneca etc. Astonishing.

125
-1
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

This has been the weirdest. I work with those that specialise in pharmaceutical investing. Their actual job is to look at clinical data and evaluate it, and invest LOTS of money on the back of it. They are meant to be critical thinkers.

They all took the bloody jabs, even those who knew they didn’t need them (“to travel”). I’ve never held back from sharing that I am unvaccinated – my initial concerns focused on the ADE risk (which I do not think we can dismiss yet, btw), and obviously now I know about the codon optimisation that was done, on the mRNA itself, and the pathogenic nature of the spike protein produced, about all the other harms we are seeing.

Some of them definitely know they have made a mistake and don’t want to discuss it. Some are justifying it on the basis that they thought they were being a good person (“I did it to protect granny”….even though there has never been any evidence ever to suggest this would be the case, even from the animal studies when the monkeys still caught it).

It just goes to show: when investing to make money, it’s not enough to be correct – you need to understand the stupidity and psychology of all those that are wrong too, as they make the market. I do think there is a tipping point though – coming soon – where it will all come crashing down. By soon I mean by end of year.

120
-1
Amtrup
Amtrup
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Yes. A mass society-wide crash/earthquake and/or critical stage of “rot”/decay in which almost everything no longer works properly or at all.

33
-1
JayBee
JayBee
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Good comment, I have some similar professional experience. A friend of mine just stated ‘I trust these guys’.
He and practically all of my (former) friends are of similar mindsets, educations and large Co employment.
I think they are the foot soldiers and useful idiots of Sheldon Wolin’s ‘inverted totalitarianism’ we are now living in and under, which also rhymes with Eugyppius’ take on the bureaucracy and its people, and more.
https://multipolar-magazin.de/artikel/sheldon-wolins-umgekehrter-totalitarismus
I became sceptical on the goo on the back of the treatment of lockdown and PCR test dissent, with Clemens Arvay’s preliminary trial result comments and his treatment setting off the alarm bells, reinforced by the AZ dosage by chance ‘discovery’ and then with Doshi’s and Rappaport’s initial review of the final trial results confirming my scepticism and the sheer lack of necessity of it ringing them even louder.
When the vaccinators then also quickly resorted to offering donuts and bratwurst as incentives, I (and even my 82 year old otherwise pretty uninformed MIL) knew officially and for sure that they were lemons and that the vaccinators now knew that they were lemons too.
The rest, the AZ recall, studies, coercion, discrimination, side-effect censorship etc. is history.

59
0
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago
Reply to  JayBee

I realised early that I couldn’t work in large plcs as critical thinking and rocking the boat is most definitely not desired amongst the sweaty employment masses.

Critical thinking is found in small organisations, before power politics takes over.

Big organisations in the private sector are driven solely by money, no questions asked.

7
0
Jo
Jo
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

I hope you are right – I said to a friend last May that I thought the injections would be stopped “by this time next year” (which currently leaves three weeks). Jessica Rose says a year from now. There’s no way I’m going to be right, and another years seems a long time, so I hope yours is the right estimate.

15
0
Sforzesca
Sforzesca
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Quite. I never realised that there were so many altruistic people. I did it to protect others. Lol.
No you bloody well didn’t, you got jabbed because you thought you were protecting yourself.
What was it, around 10% thought they would die unless jabbed.
Project fear in a nutshell.

In a sane world Mrna would never have even been considered.
But, we live in Clown World, so papers like this are deliberately ignored, AND we still encourage kids to be jabbed..

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X?via%3Dihub

39
-1
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

Same with the masks, doing it to protect you, and many still doing it, bless them/as if.

27
0
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

I’m sure some think it protects them, more likely believe that everyone else believes it protects others and they are too weak to ignore the obvious social pressure/behavioural psychology blackmail.

16
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

Another attack by these totalitarian jabbers like Carol Malone on GB News would say….”We were scared, but we still took the jab and you are selfish for not taking part”…..Not realising the fact that they volunteered themselves.

Last edited 3 years ago by Ron Smith
16
0
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

I think that a shockingly high percentage of people actually did it to virtue signal. They knew nothing about the vaccine’s safety, didn’t even think about it. They just saw the way the political wind was blowing and gave a societal BJ to their masters.

6
0
timsk
timsk
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

I hope you’re right, Sophie.
Are your views just wishful thinking, or do you have reasons that suggest to you that a tipping point has been reached and that the whole facade will tumble this year? If the latter – please share – as I need something to feel optimistic about! 😉

22
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  timsk

It is a sense, born of the number of people (and here I mean pharma sector specialists) who have said to me (over the past 2 weeks:

  • “I don’t think these vaccines are very good”
  • “I’m not having any more”
  • “I am worried about what we have done”
  • “I am beginning to think you are right” (this from someone who 6 months ago was a giant vaccine advocate so pleased with this breakthrough – though I have been bombarding him quite a bit)

Once the investors know how bad the vaccines are, and start to talk about it (and they are), it will become socially acceptable to say they are bad – which it was not, even end of last year. Then they will challenge management of Pfizer and Moderna on it (read the quarterly call transcripts – they are starting to gingerly question things), and then the management defence of the vaccines will be public (and weak). Analysts tend to be a bit chicken shit as they don’t want to piss management off and lose access, but one of the more maverick ones will have a pop. And then it will become a feeding frenzy. I have seen this many times – markets suddenly swing when herd opinion shifts.

It will be out, it will be public, and people will be able to discuss it. And then it will all collapse.

Oh and I got someone who works with the previous head of vaccine development at Pfizer (who was there through the COVID vaccine studies) to get him to have a look at the Seneff paper and explain why we shouldn’t be worried. Waiting to hear what he says.

Next I’m going to ask about the rat bio distribution “study” that came out through the FOIA request and ask whether he thought that was sufficient to give confidence in the safety profile of these compounds for mass human use.

Last edited 3 years ago by sophie123
53
0
timsk
timsk
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Thank you Sophie – very enlightening and you’ve definitely made my day! 🙂

16
0
NickR
NickR
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Sorry to burst your bubble but no day of reckoning coming. It would be in no one’s interest & people don’t want to know. I doubt the consequences of taking the vaxx are going to worsen it was just never necessary, another pointless action with a huge cost.

4
-7
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

There is a genuine need for optimistic investors in pharmaceuticals, because so many candidate drugs fail before launch that you need to be able to roll with the punches a lot.

Unfortunately, that can lead to some becoming less than rigorous in their evaluations prior to investments. They invest with their hearts, not their brains sometimes.

In this case, it is far more likely that they invested with their political hats on….

0
0
The old bat
The old bat
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

I have an 80 year old acquaintance who recently had her 4th jab and was moaning about how ill she felt, having been in fine fettle beforehand. Madness. But if you say anything, YOU’RE the mad one!

40
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

I had a young lad in my workplace who had both jabs. The second one made him very ruff and had a few days off work. I did try to warn him about not having the second. He had the first before we met. He did say after, that is it, fuck this I’m not taking another. He only had it because he didn’t want to pass Covid to his Grandmother. That and going to a club was a common reason.

Last edited 3 years ago by Ron Smith
11
0
Annie
Annie
3 years ago
Reply to  paulnb

That’s because you’ve never been a teacher.

15
0
paul parmenter
paul parmenter
3 years ago
Reply to  paulnb

There is still a vastly widespread, zombie-like belief in the overall good intentions and trustworthiness of those in government, and in the infallibility of anyone with a degree to their name and the label of “expert” around their neck. It seems to matter not one jot how often people are brazenly lied to, let down, gaslighted, insulted, robbed and physically damaged by those in power. They keep coming back for more. Like those wibbly wobbly toys that always bounce back with an idiotic grin on their faces, no matter how many times you knock them down.

Just wait until the next election, and watch the millions of votes pile up once again for the same old LibLabCon gangster conglomerates who are all pushing the same destructive groupthink agenda. All fanatics for Zero Covid, Zero Carbon, Zero freedom and a Zero economy. The only difference between them is the colour of their rosettes.

86
0
Bella Donna
Bella Donna
3 years ago
Reply to  paul parmenter

I believe there is something in the jabs that kills of certain braincells, particularly the ones that involve critical thinking.

29
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  paul parmenter

Yes, I was thinking about Trump the other day. To me he is definitely the lesser of the two evils but while he talked of the ‘Deep State’, he didn’t seem to do much about it when the subject of Julian Assange came up, and that was after saying how he “loved Wikileaks”.

1
0
JXB
JXB
3 years ago
Reply to  paulnb

Never underestimate stupid – it is the default.

19
0
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago
Reply to  JXB

and selfish.

10
0
The old bat
The old bat
3 years ago
Reply to  paulnb

I do wonder how many of those poor animals will die because of the vaccine. I seem to remember reading that using it experimentally in animals killed them all.
And who,on earth cares if a hippo gets covid anyway? Why does it matter?

15
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  The old bat

If it’s an 85 year old hippo (or whatever the equivalent is in hippo years), nobody should care. From an evolutionary perspective it is irrelevant. Similar for humans.

7
0
vicogramsci
vicogramsci
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

The only positive things Romans have given us is concrete,plumbing and western law.
To prove fraud
Common Law dating back to Cicerone
PUNTO UNO;
MATERIALLY FALSE STAEMENTS
or purposeful failure to state or release material facts which non disclosure makes other statement misleading.
PUNTO DUE;
The false statements is made to induce plaintiff to act
PUNTO TRE;
the plaintiff relied upon the false statements and injury resulted from the reliance on.
INdisputable facts that no judge in any western nation can refute hence empirical data alone will be its down fall regardless of EUA> Hence Statum dictum does not equte to favtum dictum just by statute alone Cicerone established this little historical tid bit .
but idigress Fruad prinicple alone will determine PCR test and the new therapeutics. Swine flu epidemic of 2008 alone will undue the massive lies.

0
0
Less government
Less government
3 years ago
Reply to  paulnb

There’s a sucker born every minute

6
0
Cecil B
Cecil B
3 years ago

On reflection I’m coming to the conclusion that the mass imprisonment (some call it lockdown) was not a bad thing

The real question in my opinion is why the ever so pig shit thick were allowed to wander around unsupervised in the first place

Once mass imprisonment had been achieved it should not have been rescinded

As I encounter them on my wanders I have an overwhelming feeling of contempt

41
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

That’s a little harsh. Plus I don’t want to be locked down.

16
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

It’s OK. We can identify and segregate the stupid by the bit of cloth they have stuck to their faces, and imprison them as appropriate

40
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

“The real question in my opinion is why the ever so pig shit thick were allowed to wander around unsupervised in the first place”

A very fair comment Cecil. 😀😀

4
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago

The problem is all the politicians, all the media and the entire medical establishment with a tiny amount of exceptions have been aggressive cheerleaders for these jabs.

So they will close ranks and help each other cover up or wave away their crime.

And it will be easy for them because the majority of the population took the poison and don’t want to hear how they were mistreated.

The badly affected will still be a relatively small number and will have to suffer in silence. Most likely they too will live in denial.

76
0
RTSC
RTSC
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Correct. Very few who either enthusiastically or meekly accepted the medical experiment question it, or even WANT to know that they aren’t as safe as they were told.

38
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

An Iceberg comes to mind, much more below the surface that we don’t yet know.

13
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

When they all start getting dementia in a few years time, things will be interesting.

What do we, the unscathed, do then? It’s bad enough being surrounded by sheep people. When they become demented sheep people, society will collapse.

(I’ve been scaring myself silly with the Seneff paper on G quadraplexes)

37
0
mwhite
mwhite
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihwoIlxHI3Q&t=0s

Scary???

1
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Sheep people are easier to control. People always say when referring to the WEF, WHO, EU, etc…Totalitarian Empires always crumble because of the human desire for freedom etc. Problem is, they didn’t have all this technology before. Who is to say the next drugs will keep people in a state of compliance.

5
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

“I’ve been scaring myself silly with the Seneff paper on G quadraplexes)”

Good job this stuff goes right over my head.

Last edited 3 years ago by huxleypiggles
4
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago

Experimental concoctions paid to governments for the use of their populations? Unlike individual paid volunteers. Its called a Windfall.

Last edited 3 years ago by DanClarke
10
0
NeilofWatford
NeilofWatford
3 years ago

I can’t help thinking Shane Warne’s death was caused by the vax.
Too many people with too much to lose for any transparency.

45
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  NeilofWatford

For now, yes. Until the children start dying.

When a man loses his kids he has nothing else to lose. I wouldn’t want to be one of the main players then.

37
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

Not that many kids have been vaxxed though. In this country anyway.

I think if people pushed their children to get vaxxed, they will largely be in denial that they chose to harm them. It’s not like they can deny they weren’t warned. Anyone half awake knows there are issues. I think the parents will commit suicide instead of go insane with rage, for the most part.

24
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

If you have to bump yourself off, at least take one of these scumbag Ministers with you.

7
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

In the overall scheme of things the numbers are small. So it will still be the case that the vast majority will be fine.

The problem is that the pharma establishment have succeeded in lowering the bar enormously when it comes to drug and vaccine safety.

Previously a handful of serious adverse reactions were enough to stop a drug or vaccine. Now so long as the vast majority are ok, it seems to be fine. They’ve established a new norm.

In fact it’s worse than that. They’ve flipped it around so that to report any adverse events or make a big deal out of them is now considered putting people’s lives at risk because on the whole – they tell us – jabs work and save lives so to create doubt in people’s minds is equivalent to killing people.

That is the truly revolting state of things.

He who loses a child will just have to suck it up.

39
0
JaneDoeNL
JaneDoeNL
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Yes!! Exactly this!! This is what I’m worried about. People have been conditioned to find it acceptable to have a novel, chemical concoction that has undergone very limited and short-term testing to be pumped into their bodies, in many cases subject to coercion of varying degrees, all for “the greater good”.

When it became apparent that it did not work as promised, they told outright lies saying they had never promised precisely what they had indeed promised. Then they pushed for people to inject even more of the same product that had clearly already failed, and a great number went ahead without question and did so – all the while continuing to wear masks, distancing, quarantining – literally saying by their own actions that they did not themselves believe the sludge worked. And still they think these actions were okay, still they are willing to accept more of the same if come the autumn they are ‘requested’ to get more of the sludge.

The thing to start asking these people is, will they find it acceptable that any time some virus (old or new) is doing the rounds, if the authorities tell them they must take an injection, do they believe that they are obliged to do, even if this were to mean getting a different shot literally every week/month, even if they just kept getting sicker and sicker. Force them to think, make them realise where their abdication of responsibility for their own bodies can lead to. Make them feel uncomfortable.

17
0
chris-ds
chris-ds
3 years ago

This study seems bogus and lacks credibility when it can’t make sums add up in the tables, it clearly wasn’t peer reviewed as the mistakes would have been fixed.

detractors will likely point to it as a failed study and use it to deride those who are against the cv vaccines (no not anti vax, just anti covid vax (I’m more anti mRNA than anything else)).

it looks more like ammunition against the “anti cv vax” narrative.

9
0
Amtrup
Amtrup
3 years ago
Reply to  chris-ds

Yes, it’s not impressive or reassuring if basic essential numbers aren’t consistent. And as Will says all the modelling and adjustments involved don’t help either. I’m not going to share it with anyone.

Last edited 3 years ago by Amtrup
7
0
mwhite
mwhite
3 years ago
Reply to  chris-ds

I’d say that the problem is with the pier review process

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/281528

If the reviewers had done their jobs properly there wouldn’t be a problem.

6
0
The old bat
The old bat
3 years ago
Reply to  mwhite

I can do pier reviews….. Llandudno is excellent – there you go.

23
0
RTSC
RTSC
3 years ago

I remember quite clearly that the Israelis flagged up the risk of myocarditis in February 2021 because I have two adult sons (late 20s/early 30s) and I forwarded the article to them. That was long before they were “offered” the jab. One remains unjabbed, the other had two shots because he travels abroad extensively. He now accepts that they are not safe and I hope and pray he has no more.

40
0
oblong
oblong
3 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

In may family no-one talks about the consequences of being jabbed. Yet in the last year my sister, her husband, my father and mother in law all now have high blood pressure. My sister in law in constant discomfort, her husband had open heart surgery. My niece couldn’t walk for a week. Another nieces husband has tinnitus. My brother had shingles.
Only the niece who couldn’t walk after first jab blamed it on the jabs.
Most of my family all had COVID symptoms even though jabbed multiple times.
I doubt any of them would consider yellow card as it might all be a coincidence.
I don’t speak to them about it. Not being jabbed myself has caused some upset. Though I remain in remarkably good health.

67
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  oblong

Not being able to walk is hard to blame on something else, unless you have MS or something.

19
0
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  oblong

I have a humdinger of a cold. How did that happen with all this covid flying about.

9
0
Bella Donna
Bella Donna
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

After bragging how well I had been, cold and flu free, I came down with a heavy cold which kept me in bed for a day and a half but I bounced back very quickly. I expect had I been tested it would have been positive for covid.

15
0
Bella Donna
Bella Donna
3 years ago
Reply to  oblong

The fact you remain in good health and unvaxxed must irritate them.

16
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  oblong

“My niece couldn’t walk for a week.” Bloody hell, is she alright now?

3
0
Chris_uk
Chris_uk
3 years ago

I’m 67, unvaxxed, just had Covid, it was a total nothing-burger. I barely noticed I was sick. Didn’t stop me doing anything. No normal healthy person needed these ridiculous clot shots.

51
-2
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris_uk

How did you know you had covid?

10
0
Pink Moon
Pink Moon
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris_uk

Absolutely Chris, I’ve had the main covid virus and two of the variants and with the exception of the main one back in Feb 2020 which felt like seasonal flu the other two just felt like a mild cold for a day or two. I’ve never seeked medical help because I never felt that my life was in any danger as when catching a normal cold/flu during the pre-covid years. Unless you were very frail and elderly and/or with serious underlying health issues then there really was no reason to have a single jab nevermind three jabs and now a fourth.

FO5Jv7SX0AgHRWT.jpg
Last edited 3 years ago by Ember von Drake-Dale 22
17
0
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  Pink Moon

Is this the survival rate of those who had covid, or is it a calculation of the entire populations of the respective countries including those who didn’t catch covid?

3
0
LMS2
LMS2
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris_uk

I’m 66, unvaccinated, and had covid in December/January. I was sick, and it wasn’t pleasant, but nowhere near as bad as when I had flu. I didn’t get tested as I knew what it was and precisely who I caught it from, who was confirmed to have had Omicron.
MOH, 70, unvaccinated, who caught covid at the same time from the same person, was very ill and ended up in hospital for a week.
It affects everyone slightly differently depending on existing health conditions, age, and sex. I wouldn’t say it was a nothingburger, but we’re both still glad we remained unvaccinated.

10
-1
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  LMS2

HCQ or Ivermectin with Vit D3 might’ve helped things clear up faster, if only it was available in Boots in the UK. Wonder why not!

4
0
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris_uk

I genuinely do not think I’ve had it, they should study me for science.

I never sanitise, don’t mask, only work from home when forced to, have a terrible diet and smoke sometimes. I mean it’s genuinely puzzling. Unless I was one of those “asymptomatic” “sick” people?!

8
0
John Dee
John Dee
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

You probably just have an immune system ‘to die for’ (or not, as it turns out).

4
0
mishmash
mishmash
3 years ago

UKHSA data shows triple jabbed are more likely to ‘test positive, be hospitalised and die ‘with covid’ than the non/single/double jabbed combined.

The fake vaccines are the bio-weapon, there was never a pandemic causing virus.

Last edited 3 years ago by mishmash
33
0
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago

Pity they hadn’t done this work BEFORE injecting half the planet with these drugs. Y’know, like they have with every drug since Thalidomide.

Informed consent would have been desirable, not Oops.

26
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

‘Y’know, like they have with every drug since Thalidomide.’
That would be an assumption on your part.
It turns out that for vaccines long term safety trials never take place, indeed the two month long initial phase three trail for the covid vaccines was an extraordinaril long safety trial for a vaccine.
The fact that vaccines as a matter of course go through ridiculously short safety tests is one of the main objections raised by those labelled ‘anti-vaxxer’.

8
0
The old bat
The old bat
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

This vaccine disaster has had the effect of making me look sideways at all vaccinations that are routinely offered. I am coming to the age now where it will be suggested I take one for pneumonia and one for shingles (although I’ve had shingles, so I don’t know how that works). I will not be taking them. My trust has gone completely. This was not an intended consequence, but there must be a great many people who now feel like this.

38
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  The old bat

I am inclined to agree. I’ve looked at the data and the shingles one is pretty good, but I still think, after the past year, actually you can take your vaccines and ram them all up your arse. It’s a purely emotional response, but I feel I am owed one after 2 years of shit.

22
0
John Dee
John Dee
3 years ago
Reply to  The old bat

Once basic trust is gone, it’s difficult to work out which bits you can and can’t trust them on.
Nowadays, I wouldn’t put it past them to combine the standard annual flu jab with some mRNA gloop and hope you didn’t notice.
I wonder if the continued enthusiasm for jabbing, even though the current strain is the mildest yet, is because governments have committed to buying x million shots and don’t want to have warehouses full of unused vials.

7
0
Bella Donna
Bella Donna
3 years ago
Reply to  John Dee

I heard they are thinking of combining the flu jab with the covid jab so be aware of that.

8
0
JXB
JXB
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

And we may have another ‘Thalidomide’ but many multiples worse.

15
0
LMS2
LMS2
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

The clinical testing was done on millions of people worldwide. Obama said that publicly.

13
0
Cecil B
Cecil B
3 years ago

Everyone I know that has been jabbed seem to be engaged in endless rounds of infection. Two/three weeks clear then another two weeks of colds/chest infections etc

One of these perpetually infected commented the other day that we had been very lucky. It was pointless telling her we had not been jabbed

In one group of six men in the pub five have died in the past six months. The survivor who is a rabid covidian says he doesn’t understand it. My mate (a fellow sceptic) and I exchange knowing glances every time the survivor speaks

33
-1
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

My Dad is 75 and decided that taking the jab was reckless.
All his golf buddies are jabbed, since then one has had a stroke, two have been diagnosed with cancer, one other jabber appers to be well.
My dad had the shits last Thursday (he went out for a curry) apart form that he is fine.

27
-1
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

My friend’s ex PE teacher father dropped dead, HA on the golf course – I wouldn’t ask but considering how well to-do they are and that she works for the NHS I think it’s safe to assume he was tripped stabbed.

13
0
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

I guess we should just consider ourselves lucky at this point that the leaky jab experiment didn’t produce something much worse than covid and deadly to all.

6
0
LMS2
LMS2
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

Don’t keep quiet. Say what you think, and say that you’re unvaccinated and haven’t been constantly ill. It’s time to throw back some of the bullying that we’ve all been subjected to.

Last edited 3 years ago by LMS2
24
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  LMS2

Agree – we HAVE to make it socially acceptable to say the vaccines are not good. The truth will never come out otherwise.

26
0
JXB
JXB
3 years ago

By spooky coincidence: “AstraZeneca/Moderna’s mRNA treatment for heart failure looks promisingThe therapy – an mRNA-encoding vascular endothelial growth factor – looks promising for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery”
Hmmm… so mRNA jungle-juice can act on vascular cell function. So is it too much of a stretch to imagine they were aware that the mRNA Granny-protector-juice might have an untoward effect on tissue cells?

What better than a Human trial involving hundreds of Guinea-pigs across all ages to observe this – and without the need for complex and hugely expensive ethical and regulatory work-up, and at the same time raking in huge revenues and profits with zero liability.

Now, I don’t want anyone to think I am being cynical.

26
0
JXB
JXB
3 years ago
Reply to  JXB

I meant hundreds of million.

10
0
JXB
JXB
3 years ago

‘The authors conclude the risks “should be balanced against the benefits of protecting against severe COVID-19 disease”.’

I suppose they have to say that to keep the Truth Gestapo off their backs, but the increasing volume of hard data shows the pseudo-vaccines are actually increasing the risk of infection, severe disease and death with rates much higher than in the unvaccinated, and worse, seemingly accumulative – the more doses the higher the risk.

it is clear the pseudo-vaccines are damaging immune systems, the questions are, is it short term or long term; is it just muting the response to CoV 2 or other pathogens?

17
0
Moderate Radical
Moderate Radical
3 years ago

It’s an absolute horrow show:

Highlights

• mRNA vaccines promote sustained synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

• The spike protein is neurotoxic, and it impairs DNA repair mechanisms.

• Suppression of type I interferon responses results in impaired innate immunity.

• The mRNA vaccines potentially cause increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer.

• Codon optimization results in G-rich mRNA that has unpredictable complex effects.

[…]

16. Conclusions

There has been an unwavering message about the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 from the public health apparatus in the US and around the globe. The efficacy is increasingly in doubt, as shown in a recent letter to the Lancet Regional Health by Günter Kampf (2021b). Kampf provided data showing that the vaccinated are now as likely as the unvaccinated to spread disease. He concluded: “It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures.” Moreover, the inadequacy of phase I, II, and III trials to evaluate mid-term and long-term side effects from mRNA genetic vaccines may have been misleading on their suppressive impact on the innate immunity of the vaccinees.

In this paper, we call attention to three very important aspects of the safety profile of these vaccinations. First is the extensively documented subversion of innate immunity, primarily via suppression of IFN-α and its associated signaling cascade. This suppression will have a wide range of consequences, not the least of which include the reactivation of latent viral infections and the reduced ability to effectively combat future infections. Second is the dysregulation of the system for both preventing and detecting genetically driven malignant transformation within cells and the consequent potential for vaccination to promote those transformations. Third, mRNA vaccination potentially disrupts intracellular communication carried out by exosomes, and induces cells taking up spike glycoprotein mRNA to produce high levels of spike-glycoprotein-carrying exosomes, with potentially serious inflammatory consequences. Should any of these potentials be fully realized, the impact on billions of people around the world could be enormous and could contribute to both the short-term and long-term disease burden our health care system faces.

Given the current rapidly expanding awareness of the multiple roles of G4s in regulation of mRNA translation and clearance through stress granules, the increase in pG4s due to enrichment of GC content as a consequence of codon optimization has unknown but likely far-reaching consequences. Specific analytical evaluation of the safety of these constructs in vaccines is urgently needed, including mass spectrometry for identification of cryptic expression and immunoprecipitation studies to evaluate the potential for disturbance of or interference with the essential activities of RNA and DNA binding proteins.

It is essential that further studies be conducted to determine the extent of the potential pathological consequences outlined in this paper. It is not practical for these vaccinations to be considered part of a public health campaign without a detailed analysis of the human impact of the potential collateral damage. VAERS and other monitoring systems should be optimized to detect signals related to the health consequences of mRNA vaccination we have outlined. We believe the upgraded VAERS monitoring system described in the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. study, but unfortunately not supported by the CDC, would be a valuable start in this regard (Lazarus et al., 2010).

In the end, billions of lives are potentially at risk, given the large number of individuals injected with the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines and the broad range of adverse outcomes we have described. We call on the public health institutions to demonstrate, with evidence, why the issues discussed in this paper are not relevant to public health, or to acknowledge that they are and to act accordingly. Furthermore, we encourage all individuals to make their own health care decisions with this information as a contributing factor in those decisions.

(my bold)

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X

Nothing to see here. There’s a war on, don’t you know!

This is beyond scandalous. It is unforgivable. This is nothing short of an indictment of the rush to pump out an unproven novel biological technology. Heads should roll for this. A good argument can be made that the phrase ‘heads should roll’ ought to be interpreted in a literal fashion.

33
0
mwhite
mwhite
3 years ago
Reply to  Moderate Radical

You’ll like this then

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzEigubrO5A

“Spike Protein Spills in the Blood of the Vaccinated Individuals (Study)”

5
0
Moderate Radical
Moderate Radical
3 years ago
Reply to  mwhite

Thanks. I’ll watch it later.

0
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  mwhite

I remember when that came out last year (in pre print), it was pooh-poohed by the mainstream as “too small a study to be relevant”

Of course it’s bloody relevant! They should have done all this work before it was rolled out!

13
0
Moderate Radical
Moderate Radical
3 years ago
Reply to  mwhite

I’m watching it now. 25 minutes in. Words fail me, my friend.

3
0
Smelly Melly
Smelly Melly
3 years ago

Was granny saved, thats the important thing?

And can you look her in the eyes and say you weren’t “vaccinated” (bullied, coerced into having it).

Last edited 3 years ago by Smelly Melly
10
0
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago
Reply to  Smelly Melly

You’ll need something stronger than Pfizer to save mine.

5
0
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago

Can someone tweet this article to JHB and ask her how she feels about relentlessly banging the jab drum for months on end on her show, and if the money was worth it?

21
0
LMS2
LMS2
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

The only – the only – thing I can say in her defence is that she has repeatedly said she doesn’t believe children and teenagers need the vaccine. But otherwise she’s gone along with the government narrative. And she’s had covid twice now.

8
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  LMS2

Was she in on the coercion though. I have no problem with people who support personal choice?

Last edited 3 years ago by Ron Smith
4
0
A passerby
A passerby
3 years ago

A cynical person might suggest our inept government have been investing our taxes in a pharmaceutical ponzi scheme. So far the only return has been the opposite of improved health. ‘Gamblers Anonymous’ might be worth a call!

9
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago

The film Equilibrium 2003 is a perfect example of this collectivist madness and where it can lead.

1
0
NickR
NickR
3 years ago

These kind of articles by Will Jones are invaluable, just a shame they don’t get the MSM asking questions.

6
0
Richard Austin
Richard Austin
3 years ago

I was talking to a mate today. He likes walking and running. Only just in his 40’s. I said “You’re finding walking and running hard aren’t you? You feel like your heart is overloading”. I haven’t seen him in the flesh for 2 years but we talk a fair bit. I asked “How do I know that?” and posted this article.
So many people fell for the “It’s perfectly safe even though we cooked it up in a weekend”. Some day these people have to be made to pay for what they have done. Will there be enough people left to make them pay?

12
0
kate
kate
3 years ago

Poland has unilaterally backed out of its contract to buy the BioNTech/Pfizer coronavirus vaccine, claiming oversupply and financial difficulties brought on by the flood of millions of migrants fleeing the Ukraine conflict, according to Health Minister Adam Niedzielski.
Niedzielski told TVN24 that the Warsaw administration had notified the European Commission and vaccine providers late last week that it was activating a force majeure clause in the procurement contract and would refuse to pay for or accept delivery of any additional doses.
The improving pandemic situation, according to Niedzielski, meant that vaccinations were no longer required. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian refugee crisis had put a strain on the government’s budget.
The government attempted to find a compromise by asking for deliveries to be staggered over a 10-year period, but “we encountered a complete lack of flexibility on the part of the producers,” he said.

https://greatgameindia.com/poland-cancel-vaccine-contract-pfizer/

7
0
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago

‘For some reason the study did not look at the risk outside the 28-day post-vaccination window, so we don’t know whether the elevated risk continues past that period.’

I can answer that one easily: the authors will want to publish a second paper on different time frames, since publishing two papers is better than one when publishing the same material.

Careers progress by publishing hundreds of shorter papers, not five seminal ones.

3
0
vicogramsci
vicogramsci
3 years ago

The law and civic law in general is a “bitch” excuse my profanity. One thing that western so called civilisation forgets is that the so called “Romans ” have given us is concrete, plumbing and civic law. Old Latin saying ” Statum Dicues Statum Factum Stutus Dictum. In So called modern democracies let say dating back to the mother of all modern day “revoluzioni” The American Revolution to the more recent ones lets say good old Benito financed and payed by lets say financial interest Adolfo. States make laws they hide by the semblance of law because it becomes statute.
Principles of contract law 101
Required elements to prove fraud:
PUNTO UNO:
Materially false statements or purposeful failure to state or release material facts which non disclosure makes other statement misleading.
PUNTO DUE: The false statement’s is made to induce Plaintiff to act.
PUNTO TRE: The Plaintiff relied upon the false statements and injury resulted from this reliance.
Hence civic law is another kettle of fish but Romans have given us all the modern tools to bury this once and for all.
Safe and effective the percentages of efficacy that were parroted.
The mere fact that already we are cing the remnants of the Romans are the recent federal district USA court readings on g-string and jock strap laws on federal travel in the USA.
January the fed district court ruled. “The Data Dump and all the adverse reactions recorded by all the test group during the phase three trial.
Fed EX workers circa half million instantly immune from any BS MANDATE EUA therapeutic products forced upon the people via such Dictum Stutum.
Cing I live in the new EMPERO ROMANO Natostan. Roman precedent is a bitch like concrete plumbing and civic law. Those principles date bak to Cicerone.
So my fellow Natostaners thats how the cookie will crumble.
There is more because if anyone recalls the famous PCR test and the cycles threshold BS.. There is so much what i would do to be a Barrister in the dien Natostan empire.

.

0
0
morganlefey
morganlefey
3 years ago

Crimes Against Humanity don’t expire, and the perpetrators and principal collaborators of the covid policy assault against humanity should look forward to prosecution, in every jurisdiction.

1
0
marebobowl
marebobowl
3 years ago

If msm bothered to write what has really taken place with these experimental biologicals, most people would decline.

3
0
conocido en valenciana
conocido en valenciana
3 years ago

………….. it’s hard to see how it could be worth it, or why these vaccines have not already been withdrawn for younger age groups.

As we can say but the writer of the article perhaps can’t (or chooses not to): because it ain’t about health. Easy.

0
0
ThomasTurk
ThomasTurk
3 years ago

What do the injected expect from graphene, AIDS, hep, cancer, parasites and nanobots VERIFIED in unlabelled mRNA injections?

 Oxide: A Toxic Substance in the Vial of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine? By Ricardo Delgado and Prof Michel Chossudovsky Global Research, January 19, 2022.

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko. The mRNA injections HAVE AIDS!

Swedish study 2.28.22 demonstrated and confirmed that the mRNA in the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid injections infiltrate cells and transcribes its message onto human DNA within 6 hours, altering our own DNA

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Autopsies Prove Vax BioWeapon Caused Autoimmune Attacks And Death. (Based on 70 autopsies done by Germany’s top pathologist, Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt).

Austrian graphene Research Scientist/Med. Dr. Andreas Noack was MURDERED after he released his evidence of graphene in the 4 mRNA injections, and describing it as ”razor blades in the blood that will kill all who get it”.

Prof Igor Chudov Pfizer vaccine, taken once, permanently changes the DNA of affected cells…DNA transcribed from Pfizer mRNA Vaccine contains mutant gp130 Cancer Cells. 28,2,22

Journal of Hepatology. Immune-mediated hepatitis with the Moderna vaccine.. confirmed.

Brghteon. Dr. Jane Ruby Show. Incredible evidence of cancer diagnoses in the jabbed, exploding cancers in the boosted. 2.15.22.

1
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

In Episode 35 of the Sceptic: Andrew Doyle on Labour’s Grooming Gang Shame, Andrew Orlowski on the India-UK Trade Deal and Canada’s Ignored Covid Vaccine Injuries

by Richard Eldred
9 May 2025
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

Sun-Dimming Quango has £800 Million of Taxpayer Money to Blow – and a CEO on £450k

8 May 2025

News Round-Up

9 May 2025

UK “Shafted” by US Trade Deal

8 May 2025

The Sugar Tax Sums Up Our Descent into Technocratic Dystopia

8 May 2025

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

9 May 2025

News Round-Up

26

The Sugar Tax Sums Up Our Descent into Technocratic Dystopia

25

Sun-Dimming Quango has £800 Million of Taxpayer Money to Blow – and a CEO on £450k

28

UK “Shafted” by US Trade Deal

12

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

10

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

9 May 2025

“I Was a Super Fit Cyclist Until I Had the Moderna Covid Vaccine. What Happened Next Left Me Wishing I Was Dead”

9 May 2025

Nature Paper Claims to Pin Liability for ‘Climate Damages’ on Oil Companies

9 May 2025

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

9 May 2025

In Episode 35 of the Sceptic: Andrew Doyle on Labour’s Grooming Gang Shame, Andrew Orlowski on the India-UK Trade Deal and Canada’s Ignored Covid Vaccine Injuries

9 May 2025

POSTS BY DATE

April 2022
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Mar   May »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences